Thursday, 5 April 2012

Another Look at the Last Supper

Since this is Easter Week and Thursday evening is the traditional time when the Last Supper would have been celebrated, and since I last talked about banquet seating, it seems an appropriate opportunity to discuss the seating and style of the Last Supper.

In reality, according to customs at the time of Christ, the seating arrangement and style of banquet would have been nothing resembling the famous painting by Leonardo da Vinci. In fact, it would have probably been in keeping with the Greco-Roman banquet. This formal style of banquet originated with what is known as the symposion, an ancient Greek social institution, usually reserved for males. Think of it as the prototype for today's business meeting, except with a lot more drinking and entertainment. The first part of the meal was called the deipnon, the actual eating part. The second was called the symposium. During this second part, guests lingered over wine (diluted with water in the traditional Greek fashion) and enjoyed entertainment generally in the form of music and dancing.

This style of banquet was adopted by the Romans and and in their inimitable way, changed to suit their needs. It was in place at the time of Christ. There were many common features of the banquet, but four important ones included:
  1. Guests reclined on couches rather than being seated at a table as is common today. Typically, each guest would recline on his left elbow on a cushion, with feet outstretched on the couch. He would then have his right hand free for eating and drinking.
  2. Couches were placed according to a sliding scale of social rank, most often in a U-shape or a crescent-shape by the time of the Roman empire. 
  3. Guests were provided with a servant who would remove their sandals and wash their feet as preparation for reclining. 
  4. In most cases, food would be served on removable trays placed on small tables within reach of the diners. 
The following images portray the style of the symposium and the later Roman banquet.


Greek symposium or symposion



Roman banquet

Worth noting from these images is the closeness of the diners to each other, often - in the case of the Roman banquet - even sharing a couch amongst three or more. It is undoubtedly this closeness that aided the social bonding so inherent in the ritual practice of the banquet. It solidified group identity, as did the sharing of wine and bread.

The seated position of the diners, notably angled and with feet extended to the back of the couch, enabled their feet to easily be washed by servants, as was the custom, and which was a part of the Last Supper. Of course Christ took the part of the servant.

With respect to the seating arrangements, the later Roman banquet which was likely the one most closely resembling the Last Supper, used three tables, the lectus summus, lectus medius, and lectus imus. They were set up in a horseshoe shape around a room known as the triclinium or three-couch room. Seating was arranged according to tradition and using positions that numbered starting at the left-most end of each couch as one faced the inside. The host originally sat at position #1 at lectus summus or more commonly at position #3 at lectus imus. That would probably have been the position of Jesus. The guest of honour or locus consularis was position #3 (or the last position) at lectus medius. This would probably be the position of Judas at the Last Supper, or immediately to the left of Jesus.

According to the gospels, John at one point leans toward Jesus at the urging of Peter and asks him who will betray Jesus. With the disciples in these positions, it would be very easy for Jesus to whisper back without being heard by Judas who would be sitting on the other side of him. Thus, John was likely at position #2 at lectus imus and Peter probably at position #1 at lectus summus (remember also a place of honour), across the dining area from John, making his possibly surreptitious motion easy to be seen by John because of the way they would be reclining.

The following diagram depicts this layout.


































Of course, we will never know exactly what transpired or where everyone was, but it is interesting to look at the Greco-Roman tradition and make educated guesses.

Happy Easter!

References:

  • Smith, D.E. (2003). The Greco-Roman Banquet as a Social Institution. Meals in the Greco-Roman World Consultation, AAR/SBL Annual Meeting.
  • Smith, D.E. (2003). From Symposium to Eucharist: The Banquet in the Early Christian World. Minneapolis: Augsburg Fortress.
  • Pope, Msgr. C. (2010). The Seating Plan at the Last Supper. Archdiocese of Washington. Retrieved April 5, 2012, from http://blog.adw.org/2010/01/the-seating-plan-at-the-last-supper/.

1 comment:

  1. Hey there! This is a good read! How I wish I could visit this place someday. You have a very informative and interesting page. Keep writing good stuff like this. I'll be looking forward to visit your page again and for your other posts as well. I had so much fun reading and of course to have additional learnings from you with this blog. Kudos! Thank you so much for sharing with us an information about this one.
    Based on what I have read on a website, the institution of the Lord's Supper is recorded in the three Synoptic Gospels and in Paul's first epistle to the Corinthians. The words of institution differ slightly in each account, reflecting a Marcan tradition (upon which Matthew is based) and a Pauline tradition (upon which Luke is based). In addition, Luke 22:19b-20 is a disputed text, which does not appear in some of the early manuscripts of Luke. Some scholars therefore believe that it is an interpolation, while others have argued that it is original.
    Check out all of the options to see what you’re interested in and what you absolutely can’t miss!

    last supper tickets

    ReplyDelete